Back to the IMPLEMENTATION PATH
Back to the IMPROVING PATH
Main aspects:
- Data collected on current stock of HWF allow to know: number of active professionals; number of full-time equivalent; types of providers; where they work; their skills; the services they provide; workloads, including also gender and age;
- Workloads are not collected, as this is multi-interpretable in the Netherlands;
- The FTE is partly measured by asking the specialists themselves;
- The strength of this solution is good. The employed clinical specialists already account for 58% of the total population and the information retrieved is reliable. They are able to do comparisons between the earlier surveys amongst all clinical specialists and the data in this database;
- The remaining weakness is the lag time of two years for the data to become available. Another weakness is that the relation between reported FTE and actual hours worked is not determined.
Good practice video interview
Good practice: Data collection and FTE estimation in the Dutch planning system
Expert: Victor Slenter | Medical specialist Society & Health | CEO | Areas of special interest: Specialists for the Mentally Disabled/ Medical Graduates/ Public Health Officers
Download the document [PDF 290 KB] (Data Collection in The Netherlands)